Using social effects to improve customer retention

It is logical to think that a person’s social network influences their buying behaviour.  If my friend likes company X they will probably tell me about it and I too may like them enough to become a customer.  Indeed, leveraging this idea has long been used in the endless variety of “friend-get-friend” programs used in customer acquisition campaigns.

However, if something works forwards (getting customers) it may also work backwards (losing customers).  Do people stop being your customer if their fiends stop?  Yes, as it turns out, they do.

This recent paper by the Marketing Science Institute (Social Effects on Customer Retention) shows that defecting customers can indeed take others in their social network with them.

To summarize their findings:

a [social] network neighbor increases a customer’s hazard of defecting…exposure to a defecting neighbor is associated with an increase in the focal customer’s hazard of defecting as much as … 80%.

What’s more the more similar two neighbours are, the more pronounced is the effect.  However, over time the impact of the friend leaving reduces substantially.

…the influence of a neighbor’s defection decreases markedly with the passage of time, and a customer’s loyalty “immunizes” him or her against the effects of a defecting neighbor.

This should come as no surprise to marketers.  After all there is no such thing as a free lunch and if we want to leverage a social media to get customers we should expect that it can lose us customers as well.

So what to do?

Keep your existing customers

For many years I have espoused a focus on customer retention.  I have built many customer retention business cases to show the bottom line cost of not managing this company asset (customers) properly and the incremental value of investing properly in it.

It seems now that all of those business cases have actually underestimated the real cost of a lost customer.  It’s not just losing this customer that we have to consider but also the loss of their social network peers.

If we needed more evidence of the importance of customer retention, not that I did,  we have it here.

Proactively contact a lost customer’s social peers

If a customer does leave then we should be actively reaching out to that customer’s social network to “nurture” them through the initial period of loss and prevent them leaving as well.

Easier said than done you might say: how can we know the others in a customer’s social network?  With the data at the finger tips of most companies that task is not as hard as it at first seems.

If you are a telco then look to the telephone numbers that your lost customer calls most often.  It’s a pretty good chance that they are in the person’s social network.  If those other numbers are your customers, then execute some type of outbound communications. The type of contact should be relative to the customer’s value to your organisation.

If you happen to be in the banking or insurance industries look to the contact and transaction data that you have.  When person A closes their transaction account, contact the other account holders with the same address.

Retailers who have customer loyalty programs can use the same address and transaction data to contact the near social networks of customers who have slowed or stopped making purchases.

Where the customer was acquired via a “friend get friend” campaign then you should look to the lost customer’s original friend and target them with a communication.

It should come as no surprise that social networks are a double edged sword; so we should be just as robust about protecting ourselves from the negative effects as we are at leveraging the positive effects.

By Adam Ramshaw

Is this the wrong way to use social media as a service channel?

It is clear that leading brands are using Twitter and other social media channels to deliver reactive service to their customers.

Probably the best known of these is BestBuy with their @twelpforce Twitter account.  Staff at the computer chain use their Twitter accounts to answer questions from customers all over the country.

http://business.twitter.com/twitter101/case_bestbuy

Less well known, outside Australia, is the use that Telstra are also making of Twitter to “reach out” to customers who voice concerns or issues with Telstra products via their personal Twitter accounts.

But are the hotels featured in this Wall Street Journal article (‘I Hate My Room,’ The Traveler Tweeted. Ka-Boom! An Upgrade!) taking things one step too far?  In summary, the story discusses how hotel chains are listening on Twitter to pick up service issues that their customer are having.  Then they are diving in to help resolve the customer’s problem.  Nothing wrong here.

It’s the next step that I start to wonder about.  It seems that the number of followers a person has on Twitter may be determining the sort of response that the hotel provides.  If you have a lot of followers then you seem more likely to get room upgrades and free cocktails.

This leaves me questioning two things:

Why are you training your most visible customers to complain?

Don’t get me wrong having an open ear to customer complaints is a great way to hear what is going wrong in your organisation and fix it.  However, if you start to train your customers that for every negative Tweet that they send they receive a positive reward then you’re going to breed an army of people complaining long and hard about every little thing, real and imagined.

And you know that the high volume “road warriors” are going to learn this faster than anyone.  It won’t be long before you’re spending all of your time running around giving everybody on Twitter, a room upgrade.  Which brings me to my second question:

Is this a zero sum game?

This seems to me like the start of a new zero sum game, similar to the one the airlines embarked on when they invented the Frequent Flyer program.  If you give everyone who complains a room upgrade, then pretty soon everyone is complaining and you have to give everyone a room upgrade, and so do all of your competitors.

Then you’re back to where you started because someone still has to get the room by the air conditioner.

I don’t think that the solution to this issue is to ignore the new service channel.  Using Twitter as a service input and customer resolution channel is a great idea and has worked really well for organisations that have embraced it.

Perhaps the issue is that organisations are focusing too much on surprise and delight in an effort to drive customer loyalty rather than the basics of just solving customer problems.  This new Harvard Business Review article (Stop Trying To Delight Your Customers) has a good take on the issue.  It shows new research that customer loyalty is driven more by solving customer problems quickly and accurately, rather than spending time trying to surprise and delight customers.

Of course, social media can be used in very productive ways to improve customer loyalty and generate real company value.  This social media training course provides a starting point for just that.

By Adam Ramshaw

Achieving Better Customer Retention through Social Marketing

We’re putting on a half day seminar on Social Marketing strategies and their relevance to commercial marketers.  See below for more information.

A half day seminar – 4 May 2010 Sydney

Book Achieving Better Customer Retention through Social Marketing now

Direct Marketing has spent decades perfecting “the right message to the right person at the right time through the right channel,” decreasing segment sizes toward 1-to-1 Marketing. The focus has been on determining how customers are different and then marketing to those differences.

Social Marketing changes the attitudes and habits of a community. Reducing the smoking rate in many countries is just one example of the power of Social Marketing. Generally funded with public monies, Social Marketing also has a focus on individuals, but through community.

As customers become less responsive to direct marketing communications, they have become more involved with online communities and more receptive to recommendations from people like them. Increasingly, the task for commercial, for-profit, marketers is to work inside a community of pseudo-anonymous customers in sites like Facebook, YouTube or Twitter, because that is where customer attention is now concentrated.

In this brand-new world, the skills of Social Marketing are hyper-relevant. In this session, Tim Tyler will discuss successful Social Marketing strategies and their increasing relevance to commercial marketers.

In this practical 3 hour seminar you will learn:

• The changing ways that customers are consuming content
• How you must following customers – or lose them
• Connected marketing and how to use it
• The Influentials and the new 30 second spot?
• How to develop a Social Marketing framework

What to know more? Download the booking form for Achieving Better Customer Retention through Social Marketing

By Adam Ramshaw