Are you stuck on the delight the customer merry-go-round?

I’ve always considered that the delight the customer approach to customer loyalty and retention was a little misguided.  It’s not so much that a delighted customer is not a good thing to have.  It is.  We’ve all heard stories of the sales rep who goes above and beyond the call of duty and generates a very loyal customer.

The problem is how to put this idea into a repeatable process for the organisation.  Exhorting staff to delight the customer is not a very repeatable nor trackable process.

So I was delighted, no pun intended, when “Stop trying to delight your customers” was published by the Harvard Business Review.  The authors have investigated what keeps a customer and have discovered that making it easy for customers builds more loyalty than delighting them.  This resonated with me and probably anyone else who walks up to their “usual” coffee shop knowing that the guy or gal behind the counter knows your order and has already started making it.

In particular the authors identified two critical findings in their paper:

“delighting customers doesn’t build loyalty; reducing their effort-the work they must do to get their problem solved-does.”

“acting deliberately on this insight can help improve customer service, reduce customer service costs, and decrease customer churn.”

The other key item for me was:

“Twenty percent of the “satisfied” customers in our study said they intended to leave the company in question; 28% of the “dissatisfied” customers intended to stay.

To paraphrase that: Customer Satisfaction <> Customer Loyalty.  We’ve heard this before but it bears repeating.

Dixon et al. go on to present some good point solutions to typical company problems and suggest a new metric: Customer Effort Score.   It was here, however, that my preferences diverged from the authors.  Transactional Net Promoter Score seems, to me, to be the best approach to implementing “make it easy” in an ongoing process applicable to all businesses.

Transactional Net Promoter Score executes the NPS question (see our free “Introduction to Net Promoter Score” for more information) at key customer touch points.  Performed in this way it is an excellent diagnostic for the customer service experience and particularly “making it easy” for customers.

To use Transactional NPS in this situation you would:

  1. Execute an NPS Survey: execute an NPS survey after each transaction at a significant customer touch point.  The survey can be performed via email or outbound call but email is much lower cost.
  2. Implement Service Recovery: where a customer scores the organisation low on the “would recommend” question, provide the customer with the option to have someone call them back to initiate service recovery.
  3. Collate and review the qualitative data: The second question in the NPS survey should be something like: “What is the most important reason for giving us that score”.  This is where you will find the key issues that customers are facing.
  4. Root cause analysis: Root cause analysis using the qualitative data from the second question as the starting point will help you find the places in your organisation where you are making it hard for customers. One of your goals should be to categorise this qualitative data into themes.  That will make it easier to rank the issues and perform the root cause analysis.  You can wait until you have enough survey data to create your themes.  Or use the techniques suggested in this post “Determining what might be important to a customer”.
  5. Make changes: Once you understand the root causes you should look to make changes in your organisation to eliminate problems and make it easy for customers.

This process can be data and reporting intensive but there are some ways to automate it, see Automating Transaction Net Promoter Score Data Collection.

In this case a specialist NPS application with the ability to link to your customer systems is a good approach.  These systems provide much of the reporting and analysis functionality straight out of the box, streamlining implementation.

So trying to delight the customer is a nice goal but making it easy for them is more likely to deliver serious improvements in customer value.  If you agree with the authors on that, then Transactional NPS may be a good way to collect the data that you need to make changes in your business.

If you are thinking about implementing Net Promoter Score (NPS) in your organisation give us a call. We can help you to implement an effective Net Promoter Score customer needs survey program for your business.

Net Promoter, Net Promoter Score and NPS are registered trademarks of Bain & Company, Inc., Satmetrix Systems, Inc., and Fred Reichheld.

By Adam Ramshaw

The Secrets of Great Customer Experience Organizations are not so Secret

When a new business buzz makes headlines, a new buzz of how to’s follows.  Customer Experience Management (CEM) is no different.  But, to me, Customer Experience Management is mostly a new theatre for existing skills, not a new set of skills.

Forrester does good research but in this recent article: Three Secrets Of Success For Customer Experience Organizations, they may be looking for problems that do not exist and finding solutions that are generic.

The three Customer Experience Organisation secrets they uncover boil down to: good leadership, collaborative teams and enough resources to deliver.  These are not the special and unique secrets of success for Customer Experience Organisations.  They are the secrets to success for every non-line management support organisation.

That is not to say that there is no specialisation required to design and build great customer experiences.  There are indeed a range of domain specialist skills needed when running a customer experience management organisations.  These include a knowledge of the key customer focused tools/concepts such as Net Promoter Score and Moments of Truth. It is also important to understand and be able to apply techniques such as Touch Point Mapping.

Also, a working knowledge of how customers respond in different situations is important.  Understanding that customers don’t necessarily make rational (or even conscious) decisions about what is most important to them in a specific customer experience setting is an important, non-obvious, insight.

To be successful in CEM staff must care about making a difference in the customer experience.  They must also have an intuitive understanding that a great customer experience is not just great for the customer but also great for the bottom line of the company.  Designing an experience that customers will come back for is not as important designing one that customers like and meets the commercial goals of the company.

Beyond these domain specific skills, however, the skills required of the customer Experience Management team can be found in traditional quality management approaches and their later incarnations such as Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma.

In fact many of the “lead from the middle” attributes of successful business improvement teams can, and should be, found in the Customer Experience organisation.  Rarely does the customer Experience management team have a line management role; it is more often deployed across business units as an enabler, inspirer and facilitator to the business.

In this deployment, the cross-functional coordination skills of the team members are important, as is clear CEM leadership from senior line management.  Again these are not special Customer Experience attributes– they are attributes required for any non-line management enabler team.

Before I close, there is one specific item that I will disagree with from this paper and it has to do with resources:

Their own budget. When customer experience projects must compete with projects from operations and product management, they often fall below the funding line because those groups’ goals — like revenue generation — carry more weight.

In the Customer Experience Management work that we do we ensure that business cases are created to support all changes.  To be successful long term, CEM must stand head to head with the other areas of the business  in generating shareholder returns.  If it is treated as a “special case” it will never get an equal seat at the table with sales, marketing, operations and the other areas of the business.  And, as we know, “special cases” only last as long as they are fashionable.

If you’d like to learn more about Customer Experience Management download our 4 Steps to Customer Experience Management whitepaper.  It examines the process of determining the value, designing and executing Customer Experience Management (CEM) programmes.

By Adam Ramshaw